Rising Threats Against Swedish Politicians Spark Public Debate and Legal Action

A controversial trial against an activist for threatening politicians highlights growing concerns about safety and free speech in Swedish politics.

    Key details

  • • An activist is on trial for illegal threats against politicians Johan Forssell and Benjamin Dousas.
  • • Leif GW Persson publicly supported the activist, provoking backlash.
  • • One in four elected officials in Sweden faces threats and harassment, per Brottsförebyggande rådet.
  • • Seven Staffanstorp council members were acquitted of misconduct related to refugee reception decisions.

Sweden is witnessing an alarming increase in threats and harassment directed at its elected officials, a trend that has ignited public debate and legal scrutiny. Currently, a high-profile trial is underway against a professional activist accused of making illegal threats targeting politicians Johan Forssell and Benjamin Dousas. This activist's disturbing actions included placing apples painted with Hitler faces outside Forssell's home and hanging a doll with a knife and a bloody head outside Dousas's residence.

Supporters argue that these acts fall under free speech, but critics strongly disagree, cautioning against normalizing threats against politicians. Notably, criminologist Leif GW Persson publicly supported the activist's actions and offered to cover legal costs, a stance that has drawn significant backlash. Foreign Minister Maria Malmer Stenergard condemned Persson's comments, though he dismissed her criticism arrogantly.

The Brottsförebyggande rådet (Crime Prevention Council) reports that one in four elected officials in Sweden faces threats and harassment, suggesting the problem is more widespread than publicly known. The author of a leading opinion piece highlighted the dangerous precedent of excusing such behavior, recalling Sweden's history marked by political violence, including the assassinations of two ministers.

Meanwhile, unrelated but equally significant, seven members of the Staffanstorp municipal council were acquitted of gross misconduct charges concerning their decision to halt the reception of quota refugees. The Lund District Court ruled this decision did not constitute an exercise of authority, as the Migrant Agency had withdrawn resettlement assignments, making the council's action a principle decision without direct impact on individuals. The prosecutor confirmed that this acquittal would not be appealed.

The ongoing activist trial and public debate underscore Sweden's urgent need to address political threats seriously, ensuring the safety of politicians and the preservation of democratic norms.

This article was translated and synthesized from Swedish sources, providing English-speaking readers with local perspectives.

Source comparison

The key details of this story are consistent across the source articles

The top news stories in Sweden

Delivered straight to your inbox each morning.