Couple Sentenced to Prison for Celebrity Impersonation Fraud in Skåne

A couple in Skåne was sentenced to prison for defrauding victims out of nearly 3.5 million kronor by impersonating Swedish celebrities on social media.

    Key details

  • • A couple in Skåne impersonated Swedish celebrities on social media to defraud victims.
  • • They deceived eight victims into transferring nearly 3.5 million kronor.
  • • The man was sentenced to 2 years and 10 months, with deportation ordered.
  • • The woman received 2 years and 4 months, reduced due to her young children.
  • • Two others were convicted of money laundering for facilitating the fraud.

A couple in Skåne has been convicted and sentenced to prison for orchestrating a sophisticated fraud by impersonating Swedish celebrities on social media. The couple contacted eight victims under the guise of famous personalities, gained their trust, and subsequently requested financial help. The victims were deceived into transferring nearly 3.5 million kronor to bank accounts controlled by the couple.

The district court in Hässleholm sentenced the male defendant to 2 years and 10 months in prison and ordered his deportation to his home country. The female defendant received a sentence of 2 years and 4 months, which was reduced due to the court’s consideration of her two young children who would be adversely affected by her imprisonment. Moreover, two other individuals, a man and a woman, were convicted of serious money laundering for facilitating the fraud by allowing their bank accounts to be used to receive the illicit funds.

This case highlights a growing concern over social media-based fraud in Sweden, where perpetrators exploit celebrity impersonation to manipulate victims into financial scams, resulting in substantial monetary losses. The court’s sentencing aims to deter similar crimes and affirm judicial consequences for such deceptive schemes.

This article was translated and synthesized from Swedish sources, providing English-speaking readers with local perspectives.

Source comparison

Sentences of defendants

Sources report different prison sentences for the male and female defendants.

svd.se

"The summary does not specify the sentences for the defendants."

aftonbladet.se

"The male defendant received a sentence of 2 years and 10 months, and the female defendant received 2 years and 4 months."

Why this matters: The first source does not mention the specific sentences given to the male and female defendants, while the second source provides detailed information about their sentences and the reasons for the differences. This discrepancy affects the understanding of the legal consequences faced by the defendants.

Involvement of additional individuals

Sources differ on the involvement of additional individuals in the case.

svd.se

"Only the man and woman involved in the scheme are mentioned."

aftonbladet.se

"Two other individuals were convicted of serious money laundering for their roles in facilitating the fraudulent activities."

Why this matters: The first source only mentions the man and woman who committed the fraud, while the second source includes information about two other individuals convicted of money laundering. This difference is significant as it expands the scope of the case and highlights the broader network involved in the fraud.

The top news stories in Sweden

Delivered straight to your inbox each morning.