Tidöpartierna Blocks Opposition Request to Question Migration Minister Forssell
Tidöpartierna blocks the opposition's attempt to summon Minister Forssell over far-right ties controversy.
- • Tidöpartierna blocked a request to question Johan Forssell.
- • Opposition concerns about Forssell's son's far-right ties.
- • Tony Haddou criticized the unprecedented decision.
- • Opposition parties registered their dissent on the matter.
Key details
The Tidöpartierna coalition has made headlines by rejecting a request from opposition parties to summon Migration Minister Johan Forssell to a parliamentary committee in light of recent controversies surrounding his son’s involvement with far-right groups. This unprecedented decision has raised significant concerns about governmental transparency and parliamentary practices in Sweden.
On September 16, 2025, the coalition, comprising the Moderate Party, Christian Democrats, Liberals, and nationalist Sweden Democrats, blocked the request from Vänsterpartiet (the Left Party), with support from Socialdemokraterna (the Social Democrats) and Miljöpartiet (the Green Party). Tony Haddou, the vice chairman of the social insurance committee from Vänsterpartiet, strongly criticized the coalition’s decision, emphasizing it represents a deviation from the traditional norm of allowing opposition parties to question ministers. Haddou stated, "There are still significant unanswered questions regarding what Forssell knew about his son's activities and the implications this has for his responsibilities as a minister."
The controversy began with revelations about Forssell's son's ties to far-right factions. In a response to the growing scrutiny, Forssell recently claimed in a TV4 interview that his son has distanced himself from extremist organizations and condemned such ideologies. Despite his assurances, concerns persist among his political opponents about the transparency of his ministerial duties following these revelations.
Having registered their dissent against the coalition’s decision, opposition parties expressed dissatisfaction, highlighting the absence of accountability in Forssell's case. The event underscores an evolving political landscape in Sweden, where opposition voices are increasingly concerned about being sidelined in parliamentary proceedings.
As the situation develops, it remains to be seen how this decision will impact public trust in both Forssell and the Tidöpartierna coalition, as well as the broader implications for political accountability in Sweden.