Power's Pregnancy Campaign Sparks Outrage Over Gender Discrimination

Power's new pregnancy ad campaign faces backlash for perceived gender discrimination and trivialization of pregnancy.

Key Points

  • • Power offers refunds for pregnancy within 30 days of purchase.
  • • Sveriges Kvinnoorganisationer claims the ad is gender-discriminatory.
  • • Eddie Hernandez defends the campaign as a humorous societal commentary.
  • • Social media backlash criticizes the ad as distasteful.

Power, an electronics retailer in Sweden, faces significant backlash following the announcement of its controversial advertising campaign aimed at increasing national birth rates. The campaign, which is set to run from September 15 to October 5, offers customers refunds or bonuses for purchases if they can provide proof of pregnancy within 30 days. Critics, including the women's organization Sveriges Kvinnoorganisationer, have reported the initiative to the Advertising Ombudsman, labeling it as gender-discriminatory and trivializing the realities of pregnancy.

Sveriges Kvinnoorganisationer argues that the ad implies that women should utilize their bodies as payment tools and raises serious health and safety concerns, particularly for vulnerable groups. Susannah Sjöberg, the organization's secretary-general, stated that this type of messaging is harmful and trivializes important discussions regarding declining birth rates in Sweden.

Power's marketing manager, Eddie Hernandez, defended the campaign, asserting that it aims to humorously draw attention to societal challenges around low birth rates. He expressed confidence in the positive intentions behind the campaign, aiming to engage families while emphasizing that it was never meant to trivialize the decision to have children. Despite these explanations, social media reactions have been overwhelmingly negative, with many users deeming the advertisement distasteful, suggesting that it reduces women’s reproductive choices to a mere marketing gimmick.

As the campaign approaches its launch date, the controversy continues to escalate, raising questions about the intersection of advertising, gender, and public health.