New Epidemiologist Responds to Predecessor's Criticism of Public Health Agency
Erik Sturegård responds to Magnus Gisslén's criticisms of Sweden's Public Health Agency, defending its performance.
Key Points
- • Erik Sturegård disagrees with Magnus Gisslén's portrayal of the Public Health Agency as ineffective.
- • Sturegård acknowledges a need for collaboration with Swedish universities and future reforms.
- • Agency director Olivia Wigzell initially dismissed Gisslén's criticisms but announced a competence review later.
- • The state epidemiologist will now attend all leadership meetings as part of new reforms.
Erik Sturegård, the newly appointed acting state epidemiologist of Sweden, has publicly countered claims made by his predecessor, Magnus Gisslén, who recently criticized the Public Health Agency of Sweden (Folkhälsomyndigheten) for alleged inefficiencies and a lack of medical competence within its leadership. Sturegård stated, "I do not recognize that the agency would function poorly. Not at all, actually," addressing the stark contrasts in views between himself and Gisslén since the latter's resignation just two weeks ago, which was ignited by his own accusations about the agency's leadership.
Initially, Olivia Wigzell, the agency's director, dismissed Gisslén's assertions, but she later announced an evaluation of the agency's competence due to the backlash. Sturegård emphasized the need for further discussion regarding the role and placement of the state epidemiologist, acknowledging that some of Gisslén’s critiques warrant serious consideration, particularly the enhancement of collaboration with Swedish universities. In response to the criticisms, ongoing reforms have been initiated, including a mandate for the state epidemiologist to participate in all leadership meetings, not solely those related to infection control.
Sturegård underlined the unusual environment of working within an agency faced with such acute criticism, reiterating the importance of listening to feedback to foster improvements. The evolving discourse highlights a critical juncture for Sweden's public health governance as it adapts to internal and external pressures.