Legal Battle Continues Over Noise from Gröna Lund's Ikaros Ride
Gröna Lund's Ikaros ride faces legal challenges over noise complaints from residents, amid political debate and court rulings.
Key Points
- • Residents claim Ikaros produces noise exceeding public health guidelines.
- • Nacka Environmental Court ruled noise spikes do not justify operational restrictions.
- • Political figures criticize residents for their complaints against noise public venues.
- • Calls for residents to relocate have sparked significant community backlash.
The Ikaros free-fall attraction at Gröna Lund amusement park has ignited a fierce noise dispute between local residents and the amusement park, culminating in legal challenges and a controversial court ruling. Standing at 95 meters, Ikaros, since its launch in 2017, has reportedly generated significant noise disturbances that nearby residents claim disrupt their quality of life.
Residents describe the noise as a sharp, low tone that can be heard every minute during the ride's operation, overshadowing other sounds from the park. Complaints suggest that this noise exceeds guidelines established by Sweden’s Public Health Agency (Folkhälsomyndigheten). Consequently, residents have sought legal redress against the attraction, navigating through various administrative and legal channels.
On August 11, the Nacka Environmental Court ruled that while the noise levels from Ikaros occasionally surpass permissible limits, the assessment should focus on average noise levels rather than brief spikes of sound. The court expressed understanding for the residents’ concerns but ultimately dismissed their appeal, concluding that these noise levels do not warrant restrictions on Ikaros’s operation. This ruling has drawn criticism from political figures such as Dennis Wedin of the Moderate Party, who suggested that it is unreasonable for residents near entertainment venues to complain about noise. He even controversially advised those unhappy with the noise to consider relocating, a sentiment that underscores the tensions between community interests and entertainment attractions.