Left Party Politician Resigns After Drone Flight Incident at Landvetter Airport

Anton Karlsson resigns from municipal duties amid charges for flying a drone over Landvetter Airport in a protest against climate inaction.

    Key details

  • • Anton Karlsson flew a drone over Landvetter Airport as a planned protest.
  • • He faces criminal charges for violating aviation laws and unauthorized access.
  • • Karlsson denies wrongdoing, citing necessity due to the climate crisis.
  • • He has resigned from his political role in the municipal technical committee.

Anton Karlsson, a local politician from the Left Party (Vänsterpartiet) in Alingsås, has resigned from his position in the municipal technical committee following charges related to flying a drone over Landvetter Airport. Karlsson admits to the drone flight but denies that his actions were criminal, arguing that they were necessary in light of the ongoing climate crisis.

Karlsson planned the drone flight as a form of protest intended to disrupt air traffic at the airport, stating, "We had planned this for a long time, to try to disrupt air traffic by flying a drone at the airport." After conducting the drone flight, he and a companion waited nearby for security personnel while having coffee.

The prosecutor contends that Karlsson's drone flight constituted a violation of aviation laws and a security risk, charging him with offenses including unauthorized access to a protected area. However, Karlsson disputes this, emphasizing that the real risk is the climate emergency and framing his actions as an act of civil disobedience.

This development follows growing tensions at the intersection of activism and aviation safety regulations, highlighting the legal and political consequences faced when protest actions challenge security protocols. Karlsson's resignation marks a significant political repercussion from this incident, underscoring the gravity with which authorities view such breaches at critical infrastructure sites.

This article was translated and synthesized from Swedish sources, providing English-speaking readers with local perspectives.

Source comparison

Reason for drone flight

Sources report different motivations for flying the drone over the airport

sverigesradio.se

"Karlsson stated he acted out of necessity regarding the climate crisis."

omni.se

"Karlsson stated, 'We had planned this for a long time, to try to disrupt air traffic by flying a drone at the airport.'"

Why this matters: One source claims Karlsson intended to disrupt air traffic, while the other suggests he acted out of necessity related to the climate crisis. This difference affects the understanding of his intentions and the severity of the incident.

The top news stories in Sweden

Delivered straight to your inbox each morning.