Kiruna Considers Controversial Ban on Natural Stones for Gravestones
Kiruna proposes banning natural stones for gravestones to enhance safety and aesthetics.
Key Points
- • Proposed ban on natural stones as gravestones in Kiruna cemeteries.
- • Local stonemason expresses cultural concerns regarding the change.
- • Metal crosses allowed if securely anchored; wooden markers banned.
- • Final decision to be made by the church council.
The Kiruna pastorat has unveiled proposals that could ban the use of natural stones as gravestones across its cemeteries, affecting areas such as Kiruna, Poikkijärvi, and Vittangi. This significant regulatory change aims to enhance public safety and improve visual uniformity in the region's burial sites, which have traditionally favored natural stone options. The proposal comes amid growing concerns over safety for both the public and cemetery staff, alongside a desire for a more tranquil and aesthetically pleasing environment.
Local stonemason Per Erik Niva voiced his mixed feelings regarding the proposal, stating, "I think it’s good that there are rules, but for my culture and what I am used to, it feels wrong." Niva emphasizes the deep emotional ties families have with their gravestone choices, asserting that cemeteries should reflect cultural heritage. According to cemetery manager Ann-Sofie Fjellborg, while metal crosses may be permitted provided they are securely anchored, wooden markers will be banned alongside natural stones, which are viewed as less durable.
Despite the focus on banning natural gravestones, Niva pointed out that some robust options, like quartz stones, could still potentially meet safety and aesthetic standards. The church council will finalize these proposed regulations after considering community feedback.