Hospital Employee Dismissed Amid Suspected Poisoning Case at Akademiska Sjukhuset

A female hospital employee suspected of poisoning colleagues at Akademiska sjukhuset has been dismissed despite no formal charges being filed yet.

    Key details

  • • Four hospital employees fell seriously ill at Akademiska sjukhuset last autumn and required intensive care.
  • • A female employee was arrested on suspicion of poisoning but released due to insufficient evidence.
  • • She has been suspended and now dismissed from her position at the hospital.
  • • Her lawyer criticizes the dismissal as cowardly, noting she has not been charged or convicted.

A woman in her 60s, employed at Akademiska sjukhuset's children's hospital in Uppsala, has been dismissed following suspicions that she poisoned four colleagues last autumn. The incidents, which took place between October and November, led to the affected employees requiring intensive care. The woman was arrested in December on suspicion of serious assault but was released after about a month due to insufficient evidence. Despite her release, the hospital initially suspended her and has now officially terminated her employment. The ongoing investigation has not yet resulted in any formal charges against her.

Her lawyer, Stefan Wallin, criticized the hospital's decision to dismiss her as "surprising and cowardly," emphasizing that she has not been charged or convicted of any crime. He also expressed concern for his client's distress over the situation. Prosecutors confirm that the woman remains a suspect, but no charges have been filed. The hospital has taken this disciplinary action amid the serious allegations to ensure workplace safety, but the lack of formal accusations highlights the complexity of balancing legal due process and institutional responsibility.

This article was translated and synthesized from Swedish sources, providing English-speaking readers with local perspectives.

Source comparison

Timeline of arrest and release

Sources report different timelines regarding the woman's arrest and release.

dn.se

"She was detained for over a month but was released on December 15."

aftonbladet.se

"She was held for questioning and released a week later due to insufficient evidence."

Why this matters: One source states she was detained for over a month and released on December 15, while the other mentions she was held for a week before being released. This discrepancy affects the understanding of the timeline of events surrounding her arrest.

The top news stories in Sweden

Delivered straight to your inbox each morning.