Financial Struggles of Bromma Airport Ignite Closure Discussions
Bromma Airport's financial challenges prompt discussions about its potential closure and land redevelopment.
Key Points
- • Stockholm receives only 5,000 SEK per month from Bromma Airport.
- • Karin Wanngård advocates for closure to redevelop land for housing.
- • Current agreements are financially unfavorable compared to potential housing revenues.
- • The government insists the airport is essential for emergency services.
Bromma Airport in Stockholm is facing increased scrutiny regarding its financial viability amidst calls for its closure. According to Karin Wanngård, Stockholm's finance chief, the city currently receives a mere 5,000 SEK monthly from airport operations. This figure starkly contrasts with the hundreds of millions the city could earn if the land were repurposed for housing.
Wanngård has voiced strong arguments for shutting down the airport, noting that this could clear the way for the development of approximately 20,000 housing units, potentially generating extensive revenue for the city. In her remarks, she criticized the existing agreement with Swedavia, which only allows for a minimal fee of five SEK for each departing passenger. This minimal charge, paired with a considerable reduction in flights, has led to losses that are hard to justify in today's economic landscape.
The future of Bromma Airport may not be decided anytime soon, as the current government maintains a stance supporting its operation under a pact with the Sweden Democrats. Infrastructure Minister Andreas Carlson emphasized that the airport serves crucial societal functions, particularly for emergency services. Furthermore, he indicated that discussions on the airport's future would not take place during the ongoing governmental term, highlighting the complexities involved in altering such essential infrastructure.
The debate over Bromma Airport's fate underscores a significant conflict between the potential for urban development and the need for operational airport facilities. As the city weighs its options, the financial challenges remain at the forefront of public and political discourse, pointing to a significant crossroads for the airport's future and the potential redevelopment of its land into vital housing.
In conclusion, while calls for closure become louder due to financial losses, the government appears committed to keeping Bromma Airport operational, citing its importance for emergency services and logistical support.