Debate Intensifies as SD Opens Door to Support Social Democrats’ Push to Abolish Karensavdrag

The political debate in Sweden intensifies around the proposal to abolish the karensavdrag, a sick pay deduction system, as the Sverigedemokraterna (SD) signals potential support for the Social Democrats’ (S) initiative. This development marks a significant shift, considering the proposal's contentious reception across the political spectrum.

According to a report from Aftonbladet, SD’s vice leader Henrik Vinge expressed openness to discussing the karensavdrag system, acknowledging valid reasons for reviewing it though stopping short of a full commitment. Social Democrats argue that the deduction unfairly impacts professions like police officers, nurses, and construction workers, who cannot work from home and thus face disproportionate financial penalties for sick leave.

Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson sharply criticized the proposal, calling it unserious and warning that it could cost the government 40 billion kronor. He emphasized the importance of serious budget negotiations over such costly reforms. Meanwhile, Social Democratic leader Magdalena Andersson described the karensavdrag as an ongoing injustice, especially as remote work has become more common, and expressed hope for collaboration with the Christian Democrats (KD) and SD to advance the proposal in the Riksdag.

KD leader Ebba Busch acknowledged concerns about the high expenses involved in abolishing the deduction but remained receptive to exploring alternative solutions that address some of the system's problems without the full repeal.

This evolving coalition around karensavdrag reform highlights broader challenges in Sweden’s labor policies, reflecting tensions between fairness for frontline workers and fiscal responsibility. As political actors navigate these waters, key discussions are expected in the coming weeks regarding how to balance social welfare improvements with economic feasibility.

Currently, the proposal remains contentious, with significant debate on its financial implications and social impact. The next steps will involve parliamentary negotiations where parties including SD, S, and KD hold potential sway over the reform’s future trajectory.