Controversy Over Swedish Aid to Somalia Intensifies Amid 'Ghost Jobs' Allegations
Sweden faces criticism and opposition scrutiny over five million kronor sent to Somalia for three government jobs with unknown recipients amidst corruption concerns.
- • Sweden allocated five million kronor for three Somali government positions via IOM.
- • Recipients of the funded jobs remain unidentified, raising 'ghost jobs' concerns.
- • Migration Minister Forssell denies corruption, cites increased deportations to Somalia.
- • Opposition parties demand transparency and an investigation into the fund usage.
- • Conflict in Swedish aid policy noted, with different stances on aid due to corruption risks.
Key details
The Swedish government's allocation of five million kronor to fund three positions within Somalia's prime minister's office has sparked allegations of corruption and ‘ghost jobs’—positions that exist only on paper without actual workers. This funding, routed through the International Organization for Migration (IOM), aims to facilitate deportations of convicted criminals back to Somalia.
Migration Minister Johan Forssell defends the aid, asserting there is no evidence of wrongdoing and emphasizing the reputable role of the IOM. He highlighted that deportations increased fivefold, from six in 2023 to 29 in 2024, crediting the funded positions with fostering better cooperation. However, neither Swedish authorities responsible for deportations nor Forssell's own department know the identities of the beneficiaries, raising suspicion that the jobs may be held by already high-paid officials in a country with strong corruption concerns.
Opposition parties, including the Social Democrats and Left Party, have vehemently criticized the arrangement. Social Democrat Morgan Johansson described the misuse of funds as “obvious” and expressed frustration at the ruling parties’ rejection of calls to summon UN bodies like UNDP and the World Bank for investigative clarity. The opposition is seeking to have the matter reexamined by the foreign affairs committee to promote transparency.
This controversy highlights contradictions in Sweden's aid policy: despite pulling support from organizations like UNRWA over corruption fears during crises such as Gaza's hunger emergency, Sweden appears to tolerate less stringent controls in its aid to Somalia. Forssell maintains optimism about the collaboration's positive outcomes but has pledged action if concrete evidence of corruption emerges.
This article was translated and synthesized from Swedish sources, providing English-speaking readers with local perspectives.
Source articles (3)
Forssells svar om ”spöktjänsterna” i Somalia: Grundlöst
S vill kalla in FN-organ – ”Forssell står med byxorna nere”
Source comparison
Identification of recipients of funds
Sources disagree on whether the identities of the recipients of the funds are known.
expressen.se
"Forssell stated that the Swedish government has been transparent about financing three actual positions at the Somali government office."
dn.se
"A report revealed that neither Swedish authorities responsible for deportations nor Forssell's own department knows the identities of the three individuals receiving these funds."
Why this matters: Source 172104 states that the Swedish government has been transparent about financing three actual positions, while Source 171799 claims that neither Swedish authorities nor Forssell's department knows the identities of the recipients. This discrepancy affects the understanding of the legitimacy of the funding arrangement.
Concerns about corruption
Sources differ on the level of concern regarding corruption related to the funding.
expressen.se
"Forssell dismissed concerns about potential corruption, stating that there are no signs of wrongdoing."
dn.se
"Opposition parties have expressed outrage, suggesting the funds may have been misused for corrupt purposes."
Why this matters: Source 172104 emphasizes Forssell's confidence in the operations and lack of signs of wrongdoing, while Source 171799 highlights opposition claims of potential misuse of funds for corrupt purposes. This difference impacts how readers perceive the integrity of the funding process.
Latest news
Swedish Skicross Athletes Raise Safety and Speed Concerns Over 2026 Olympic Course in Livigno
Sweden Faces Challenges in Reducing Alcohol-Related Cancer Risks Amid Rising Cancer Diagnoses
Explosion Rocks Malmö Apartment Building, Bomb Squad Investigates
Swedish Tax Agency Discontinues Popular Declaration App, Launches New Service in March
Sweden Faces Serious Structural and Demographic Economic Challenges Demanding Urgent Reforms
Vaekstkapital Leads Surge in Alternative Investments in Sweden
The top news stories in Sweden
Delivered straight to your inbox each morning.