Children’s Rights Groups Condemn Government Proposal to Lower Criminal Responsibility Age to 13

The Swedish government's recent proposal to reduce the age of criminal responsibility from 15 to 13 years for serious crimes has sparked significant criticism from children's rights organizations. These groups argue that the move lacks scientific backing and threatens children's developmental and legal rights.

Representatives from Unicef Sweden and Bris have strongly opposed the reform. Li Melander, a children's rights lawyer at Unicef Sweden, emphasized that this change marks an alarming shift in society's perception of children. She underscored the importance of treating children differently within the justice system due to their immature development. Melander stressed that lowering the age undermines these protections and risks harming vulnerable youngsters.

Maria Frisk, a child secretary at Bris, described the proposal as “entirely incorrect” and pointed out the absence of scientific evidence supporting its effectiveness in crime reduction. Frisk warned that the reform may have unintended consequences, potentially involving even younger children in criminal behaviors. Instead, Bris advocates for preventive social measures, especially within school systems, to address juvenile delinquency.

Both organizations advocate maintaining the age of criminal responsibility at 15, aligning with the clear guidance from the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child. They insist that the reform disregards international standards on children's rights and call on the government to explore alternative, evidence-based approaches to juvenile crime that focus on prevention rather than punishment.

The government, including Justice Minister Gunnar Strömmer, has promoted the proposal as a necessary step to hold younger offenders accountable for serious crimes. However, the substantial pushback highlights the growing concerns over potential setbacks in protecting children’s rights and well-being in Sweden.