Calls to Abolish Key Healthcare Law Amid Remote Work Regulation Review in Sweden
Swedish politicians urge repeal of the mandatory healthcare choice system law amid concerns over policy failures and launch an investigation into remote work compliance among healthcare professionals.
- • Left Party calls for abolishing mandatory part of the law on choice systems (LOV) for healthcare centers.
- • Government investigator Clas Olsson's report highlights issues like cost control problems and criminal exploitation under current law.
- • Region politicians initiate a review on whether remote work regulations for doctors have been violated.
- • Behcet Barsom emphasizes some remote work functions are necessary for patient safety.
Key details
Two significant developments are shaking up Sweden's healthcare policy landscape following recent critiques and investigations. Politicians from the Left Party have called for scrapping the mandatory part of the law on choice systems (LOV) for healthcare centers. In a debate article published in Aftonbladet, they highlighted findings from government investigator Clas Olsson's report which identified serious issues like worsened cost control, over- and under-establishments, and exploitation by criminal actors. They linked these problems to the dysfunctional "freedom of choice" model in healthcare, drawing parallels with similar challenges in the school sector, and emphasized the need for systemic reform.
Meanwhile, Region politicians are examining the compliance of remote work practices among healthcare professionals after reports raised concerns about doctors working remotely. An immediate review has been initiated to determine if any rules have been broken. Councilor Behcet Barsom stressed that certain remote functions remain essential for patient safety and sometimes represent the only feasible option. The governing parties gave particular attention to this matter during their weekly meeting, underscoring the urgency of clear regulations in this area.
These developments reveal mounting political pressure to reassess current healthcare policies, focusing both on legislative reform of the choice system and regulatory oversight of remote healthcare work. The government investigation backing the abolition proposal lends substantial weight to ongoing debates, while the scrutiny of remote work reflects practical concerns about balancing flexibility with maintaining standards of care.